Conclusion: A Place for the Professionals
In lieu of an abstract, here is the chapter's first paragraph:
One of this project's contributors, Lew Friedland, a few years ago expressed pessimism for public journalism's future (Friedland, 2004). In a follow-up for this book he says his pessimism has only worsened (Part I Open Source interview). Another contributor, Joyce Nip, in a recent article described civic journalism as being in its "last days" (Nip, 2008). In fact, one of the editors of this volume has observed that professional journalism's own sociology of work and its self-definitions undermined any true deliberation about adopting public journalism (St. John, 2007). Those sound like pretty dire assessments. Has public journalism met its demise? Is a book discussing "public journalism 2.0" the equivalent of an argument for upgrading eight-track tape machines?
Rosenberry, Jack and St. John, Burton III (2010). "Conclusion: A Place for the Professionals." Public Journalism 2.0: The Promise and Reality of a Citizen Engaged Press , 183-187.
Please note that the Publication Information provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit http://libguides.sjfc.edu/citations.